4/25/2017

Our ideal school! (Video, leaflet and guide)



Click here to go to our video! 



Check out our leaflet, too!



OUR GUIDE


1. Context:
Hello everybody and welcome to Apollo School, the new centre of education in Arroyomolinos, Madrid, ready to answer the problems of educative infrastructures in this town located southeast Madrid. 
According to our figures, Arroyomolinos has nearly 30.000 inhabitants, 49% of the population is under 35 years old and it has the highest birth rate of all Community of Madrid with a figure up to 20 births per 1.000 residents. 
The growth of the population is so fast that even the major of the town, Carlos Ruipérez, of Ciudadanos, has warned about the schooling problems Arroyomolinos will face in the near future in early childhood education, primary, ESO and even Baccalaurate.
All these facts lead us to make an agreement with the city council to develop a new centre of high quality education called Apollo, as the Greek god of music and poetry and the representation of the golden mean amongst other things.
Our school is a government-dependent private education centre because this model allows us to develop the values from an egalitarian, nonsexist and fraternal perspective and the way of learning we promote to encourage students to build their own knowledge through real experiences, to make them self-confident and XXI Century citizens; to develop great competence in all aspects of the curriculum and to build positive social relations.

2. Some facts about the center:
Our intention since the beginning was to cover all the schooling period, from 0 to 18 years old which mean early education to Baccalaurate because the needs are in all this period and as a government-dependent private centre we need a certain number of student to be economically feasible. Also having all the educational stages help us to develop values as responsibility, trust and help the others in our students in some activities we do such us the assistance the bigger provide to the smaller or the welcome program. 
For that we have different kinds of what we can call contracts according to the different educational periods. For example, our pre-school education is almost free thanks to an agreement we signed with the city council that support nearly all the expenses of the small kids that comes here.
As 17 % of centers in Madrid region, our Primary and Secondary education is concerted which means that the Consejería de Educación contributes with about 3.000 Euros per student enrolled in these periods. It seems a huge amount of money but you must consider that public schools get an average of 6.200 Euros which is more than twice the money we receive. 
This situation forces us to charge a fee for every student to let us offer the education we want but this fee is small compared with all we offer.
If we talk about Primary Education, for example, we offer a wide schedule with many possibilities. We open the school at 7:30 to let families with both parents working let their children in the school and we give them breakfast here and provide them some activities to use the time they stay here. 
The formal Primary education schedule goes from 9 to 16.
From 9 to 12:30 we have lessons and each class does the work they have to do. From 12:30 to 14:30 is lunch time. In Primary, have lunch in the school is compulsory because we consider that part of the learning of the children to know how to nourish healthy and to behave in this kind of social situations and – most important – to learn how to eat without a television near and talk with partners, something that we, as society, are missing. 
Before and after lunch time the students have free time to do whatever they want. 
In the afternoon period we have 1,5 hour more of lessons. Some people told us to do all the classes straight on but this schedule fits better with families where both parents work which is the case of the majority in Arroyomolinos. 
We are very proud of our bilingualism, we have worked hard on it and I think we are one of the best bilingual schools of all Madrid. We offer almost 50 per cent of the classes in English. For example, between 3 or 4 hours of science, depending the course, Art and Craft with 1,5 hour per week, Religion or Philosophy for kids, depending what want the families, is in English too and, of course, English language, 4 hours per week with a wide range of activities. 
In addition to proper lessons, the language used during free time by teachers and students can be either Spanish or English, there’s no restriction. It’s amazing when you walk across the school and realize that children can play football in English, which means that our program works

3. Leadership:
Although we are a government-private centre, we consider ourselves a democratic school because we charge very low fees and we offer scholarships for those families with economic issues. This money comes from some agreement of cooperation we signed at the beginning with the big companies that works in our area share our idea of school and are conscious of the importance of being part of the community and not just employers.
So, as a democratic school our leadership can’t be other but what Kurt Lewin called democratic, based on the collaboration and participation of all members in which dialogue is the way to develop our educational and social projects.
For example, me, as manager because I am not connected with daily learning process and kids that’s why I can have a wider perspective of the center life, see aspects to improve, listen proposal from teachers and parents, and so on. With all this information that we collet though our regular assemblies, or extraordinary if needed, we discuss the current development of our school and reconsider changes if things are not working. But, as I have said, that doesn’t mean that me or other impose his will, is a shared decision based in multiple opinions and taking into account our current possibilities.
It worth to say that in Apollo all the teachers, other employees, assistants, the cook, the families, all are very concern about we want to our kids – which is the best possible education that prepare them to be good and happy people in the future, competent with all their capacities.
The fact that all we shared this aim is the key to our improvement and overcome the difficulties that unavoidably arise sometimes and are solved by dialogue.

4. Relation with families:
In Apollo we believe that educating in an efficacy way is only possible if there is complicity with families. There must be coherence between education at school and at home. That’s why parents shouldn’t educate their kids without taking into account the school education and that is the main reason why family and school need to work together.
Because of different facts such us the extension of time tables and the incorporation of women to work, schooling starts earlier day by day. No one teach parents how to educate their kids and how to face different possible situations. Families have now some special needs that school centers can´t ignore.
This is why in Apolo we think necessary the real participation of families. But in the other hand we do believe that collaboration between both of them is not always effective. To achieve an effective collaboration between the school center and families there must be communication, shared information and different points of view but establishing some limits.
Our School center belongs to a project called Learning Communities which is based in the interactions of different groups that belong to the same learning Community such as teachers, students, families. The most important part to highlight about this project is the interactive activities that they are done in it such as assemblies, workgroups, tutorials… and the way that families are involved with the center in and extra curriculum way. 
We believe that there should be only professors in classrooms because we need to be critic with the people leadering the class as it is possible that parents don’t have the necessary formation to control one.
Apart from teaching our students concepts and to develop their multiple intelligences and skills, above all, we want them to be happy.
We want childs to grow in a easy, comfort, peaceful and happyway. Because of that we have different school programs to face different possible situations such as welcome programs, projects against bullying… because we want our center to be an inclusive school, which means same opportunities for all kind of students. We learn about diversity and about many values to be good citizens and of course to be good people.
To achieve this goal it is fundamental for us to have a close relationship between teachers and students. We need to be worried about them in not only an academic way, but in a personal one. If a kid needs any kind of help, he can asks whoever he wants in the center and he would immediately receive physiological help.
This makes us feel as if we were a big family. 

5. Welcome program:
The “Welcome program” was established to help new students from different countries to adapt comfortably and satisfactorily to the new environment. Once a new student come to the school a English-spoken classmate is assigned to help him or her with everything from introduce new people in the school, accompany to classes and spaces or explain our food habits, for example.
We have a true experience of the importance of this sort of programs with Hanna and her will be interviewed by Blanca.

6. Learning model:
Our school a participate and a constructivism learning model. That means that our students´ learning will be a critic activity and teachers will be the person responsable for carrying out that students are able to move forward in their own learning. 

For constructivism, learn means to take at risk to make mistakes. Those mistakes are not consider at mistakes at all, they are consider as creative moments. The education in this type of learning is a change in the organization and the support of the methods, which allow students building their own knowledge. We have an active methodology that is one which generate interest in students and also teachers are people who promote that interest carrying out stimulant learning situation.

With that constructivism perspective we want to approach the objetive that students guide their learning process in a cooperative way. Our students do tasks and activities in groups avoiding unpleasant situations and adapting theirselves one another. With this we try to favour the students´ development of different and multiple intelligences. Each student has different intelligences develop than other so the education is adapted to that.

Apollo school has a flexible curriculum because it is necessary that all of us would be together to achieve adapt school to students needs. Our objetive is to know all that needs to foster their possibilities in one way or another.

7. Values of our school: 
Our school believes in equality for being able to help all students equally and they can start building their own knowledge evaluating diversity. We respect students, we listen them, we understand them and we try to build an education in a motivate atmosphere. 

This type of education implies that all the members of the community learn together with no matter about their origin, personal and social conditions, or even disabilities or learning problems. 


In this term our principal aim is to take effective the personal rights, equality opportunities and participation. 

8. Developed skills and how are developed

In our school the main objective is to achieve student's development by themselves. For that in the school we try to offer them all the resources they need.

We go after student's dependence. It's so important to teach students social values such as respect.

We want the collaboration between students, teachers and families.

We work with the four bases of Delors' report:

Learn to know
Learn to make
Learn to live together
Learn to be

We want to develop some skills and we work with the four Cs:

Critical thinking 
Collaboration
Communication
Creativity


9. Model of coexistence and conflict resolution

We are establishing a Finnish project called KiVa to deal with harassment cases.

The objective of KiVa is to prevent, detect and stop school bullying.

We work at three levels:

School. Teachers are informed about bullying and how to deal with it.
Class. It's taught not to accept abusive practices.
Students. The situation is monitored to verify that it has changed.

Trust is one of the main objectives. Students should feel comfortable to speak with their teachers about whatever they need. Focus on the needs of every student is something that is also working at school.

We don´t believe that a punishment is necessary to deal with conflicts, our school bet on dialogue.

10. Methodology
Our methodology is based in constructivism, social constructivism and for the first courses, behaviourism. Focusing on Elementary school, we love using this kind of methodology since it allows students to be more independent, they are encouraged to be responsible and autonomous in their own learning, they are actively involved as they form part of this big idea or project with the whole classroom, it allows a democratic environment that leads to discussions and questioning, it lets students be more dynamic, creative and interactive with what they are learning and to work together through collaborative and cooperative learning which develops a set of very different skills from social to moral values. 
We believe that the role of the teacher must be centred in cognitive modelling, as the teacher has to lead the students to reflect while they are engaged in the activities, coaching, as the teacher should motivate students, analyse their performances and provide feedback, and scaffolding, providing temporary frameworks that help the students to go beyond their capacities. (Wood and Middleton, 1975). 
A typical constructivist classroom here at the Apollo School will begin with the whole of the subject and then divide it into parts, the next thing would be pursuing students’ questions or interests in order to provide sources and materials, later learning is interaction and we try to build from what the students already know, then they work in groups and the teacher does a follow-up and assessment of their improvements and development through oral discussions, the KWL chart (what we know, what we want to know, what we have learned, how we know it), mind mapping or pre-testing. 
So basically a question or issue raises, then we study the case, we transform it into a long-term project and students work on it through different ways such as cooperative learning, (including jigsaw or peer teaching), guided instruction (Fisher & Frey, 2010) which is based in scaffolding, or problem-based learning, that achieves the goal of meaningful learning, which is non-arbitrary. We also like to work with experimentation, research projects, field trips, films and class discussions, because it brings us to a more realistic reflection of what is life and it also prepares them for a real future. 
So we can say that our learning model is based in the Kolb cycle of learning (McLeod, 2010) which is a process where four stages take place. It starts by a concrete experience or immersion. This experience or issue is observed and analysed in a second stage called reflection that allow students to formulate abstract concepts in the third stage called conceptualization and conclusions. These conclusions are later verified or actively experimented in new situations, this would be the fourth stage called application, in order to create new concrete experiences starting the whole cycle again.
11. ICTs
Of course we wouldn’t be preparing our students for the future if we didn’t consider how important ICTs and technology are. The ICT programme in our school includes the provision of essential ICT infrastructure such as teaching and shared student computers, projectors, networking equipment, learning platforms and local software or apps to support learning and to support those children with learning disabilities like, for example, dyslexia; the provision of access to broadband connectivity to schools, continuous professional development for teachers in ICT and integrating ICT within the curriculum and providing curriculum-relevant digital content and software. 
It is not only important because technology plays a big role in our daily lives and in the future, but because ICTs helps us to actively engage with students, to support inclusion and diversity enhancing the learning opportunities for all students.(UNESCO, 2008)
12. Bilingual Program
Our bilingual program has been designed in order to motivate our students on acquiring a second language, in our case the English language. 
We believe that this program is essential regarding our student’s process of learning since it trains them to be prepared to live in a society, where values such as tolerance and the involvement in other cultures (multiculturalism) are encouraged.
The whole centre develops the bilingual program but we will focus in Primary Education. The program sets a schedule where students have 4 hours of English language and Literacy, 3 hours of Science, 1h of arts and crafts, and starting in 5th and 6th grade 1 hour and a half of History of Religions.
At the same time, the whole school is divided into four Corners of English-Speaking countries. This program is called the Corner-Program. The students of each class are divided into four sections and are randomly classified into one of these Corners. 
The English-Speaking country assigned to each Corner changes every four years so that every single student knows in depth each of the Corners. It is a project where all the cycles are involved, that means that all the students from all the stages participate together; this creates bonds between students of different ages and a sense of union, that’s why we call our centre a big family.
Inside the Corner-Program we have set a system of Corner-Points, where students can acquire points and being awarded by chasing those attitudes that we want to foster in order to improve the daily life here in our school, paying special attention to be able to communicate in English.

Share:

3/13/2017

Act. 2 - Comparing Conceptual Maps (Isa)

In class we watched different videos about how people work and cooperate to have an Inclusive Education at schools. After watching those videos and reading some information about the topic, the whole group had to prepare a conceptual map including on it what we think are the important aspect in this topic and develop the main ideas.

We decided to focus our conceptual map in 5 different ideas that can help everyone to understand the main idea of what Inclusive Education is. This topic is based on having equal opportunities for everyone without exceptions. This can be carried out with inclusive didactics in order to students can be prepared to collaborate and work with any student that could be different from him or her. The internal organization of this type of education is quite different from other, for example we think that this education is carried out when teachers and students trust in each other, when students have their own responsibilities and when they attend to meetings and take part in decisions. Inclusive Education has a special interrelation with society and it keeps at date with the 21st century world.

After preparing all the conceptual maps each group, we had to compare and contrast with another group both maps. Our group had to work with Educational League group and we found that the main ideas were so similar in both conceptual maps but distributed in different ways. They were different in that Educational League´s map is more visual with draws and lot of colours. With this characteristics it is easier for people without any knowledge about the topic to understand.

They divided Inclusive Education in 4 categories: school, teachers, students and parents. Each category has different roles but they are also connected between each other. One aspect that I have to mention in a very good way is that Educational League has written a sentence to summarize the content of this topic: “School doesn´t differ from life”. 


I really like this conceptual map, 
Good Job for them! :)
Share:

3/09/2017

Learning Communities Guide

Learning communities

It is a project to transform educational centers and implement high quality education in problematic neighborhoods. That means: overcome school failure, promote integration, combat inequalities, finish with conflicts and improve marginal situations as well as promote integration, reduce unemployment rates and face the needs of the present and future society. 

All this aims are reached thanks to dialogic learning which implies an active learning for students with the help of the community through meetings, assemblies and thinking tanks.

In a learning community everybody with links to the school is involved in the learning process. which means that:
  • The center and teachers are more autonomous to take their decisions and implement them
  • Students are more implicated in their learning
  • Families are active participants in the education of their children and the center life
  • Associations settled in the neighborhood cooperate with the activities

The pedagogical approach is the possibility of favoring social change and reducing inequalities - learning is understood as dialogic and transformative of the school and its environment.

Pedagogical principles (shared with all the participants):

  • Self organization
  • The school is a learning center for all the members of the community, not only the pupils
  • Teaching has clear goals expressed and shared with the community
  • Self-esteem is developed through rigorous work and its recognition.
  • Continuous assessment through different boards
  • Equal voice of students, families and community
  • Shared leadership 
  • Equal rights and opportunities to all the community, adults included, to join any learning processes.

In all the places where learning communities have been established, the outcomes exceed all the expectations, learning achievement is above the average and decreases scholar failure.

Dialogic learning:

The main author of it is Paulo Freire – and the basis is that social reality, and learning is one of its parts, is build by social interactions so he recommend including all the community in learning experience because all are part of the children’s environment and have influence in their learning. 

Basic principles of dialogic learning:

  • Egalitarian dialogues: the different contributions of contents and opinions are considered according to their validity not their provenance.
  • Cultural Intelligences: There are multiple intelligences and all are important in different social situations.
  • Social transformation: Education and learning should focus to change the life of the people according to their needs and interests.
  • Instrumental dimension: Learning focus on the use of tools and technologies of XXI Century as well as in dialogue.
  • Meaning creation: All students find meaning and a porpouse in the subjects they studied.
  • Solidarity

Stages of learning community

To develop a learning community some stages are needed:

  1. Pre-stages:
    1. Awarness: Meetings with teachers, families and social agents to discuss about where the school is and the goals to achieve.
    2. Decision making: To decide whether go ahead or not, it depends if 90 per cent of the teachers want it and the families support the decision and the changes that will come.

  1. Main Stages:
    1. Dream phase: All the people involve discuss what they want to build, the needs of the centre, the goals to achieve and their wishes about education. This should be done every year.
    2. Priority selection: Los grupos implicados deben elegir de forma dialógica los goals to achieve and the way to do it.
    3. Planning and commissions: Regular meetings should be done to check if everything is improving in a good way and decided to change something if it doesn’t work.

Bibliography:

Basic information as a start:
  1. To know the main aspects and development of a learning community: https://www.innova.uned.es/webpages/educalia/las_comunidades_de_aprendizaje_una_apuesta_por_la_igualdad_educativa.pdf 
  2. To learn more about dialogic learning and the main role of the community in this way of learning: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/274/27417306.pdf

About CEIP “La Paz” (Albacete), the school we took as example:
  1. Web page of the centre with information, videos, pictures and examples of their everyday life: http://comunidadaprendizajelapazdealbacete.blogspot.com.es 
  2. Some videos to introduce yourselves to this learning community:
  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT_xcy9oVOg
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yow_MmRPQAo
  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfNaRsLvi8M

To be an expert about Learning Communities:

  1. Web page build to help Learning Communities with materials, examples, theories and papers, also it has a helpful Internet discussion forum: http://utopiadream.info/ca/ 


Share:

3/08/2017

Act. 1 - Reflections about other groups (Marta)

Travelchers

First of all, I want to say that this group do a great job explaining the topic and that even they were the first presentation they did it very well. 

The thing that I liked the most about this group was that they choose a video of The Lion King to present the topic. Another thing to bear in mind is that everyone in the group know everything about their presentation. 

 If I had to say something to improve I would say that the activity was a little bit chaotic because in some moments we were lost about what did we had to do. But above this, the presentation was quite well, personally I think that the topic was explained so good and all the ideas were clear. Great job!

Los gochos

I really liked the presentation that this group make. The video that they showed us about a song that a class sang was really funny and interesting. The theory was explained very well and with their own words, the presentation was so visual and that help them a little bit. I also found interesting that they focused one part of the presentation on the teacher's role. 

About the activity it seemed interesting and it was a pity that we didn't have enough time to do it, but even thought we didn't have time to do it they explained it very well and it was a creativite activity. 

 I really like your presentation Los Gochos, well done!

Fernweh 

When this group started the presentation it was quite obvious that they needed to know a 
little bit more about the presentation and they needed to meeting outside class to be more confident. Later, when they really make their presentation it was better, I saw that they were more connected between each other although I think that they could improve it. 

The theory was so well explained and the presentation was quite good but in some slides there was much text. The thing that I liked the most was the first activity they did with the blanket, in my opinion it was a very visual example of how to work in group. 

The activity was really nice and they explained very well and also they were looking how we were work in case we needed their help. 
In conclusion, it was a really nice presentation, great job! 

Othersiders 

I think that this group do a good job with the presentation. The went deeply through some concepts and with that and the video I think that the topic was explained so well and that everybody understood it. 

 The activity was so challenging and now I have more clear the TGT technique, I think that used that technique was a good point for them. I think that not all of the members speak the same but it was the first time at it is normal, so good job othersiders! 

 Educational League 

 The first thing I would like to highlight is that this group did their presentation dressed up with superheroes costumes and it was a good point to catch everyone's attention.

 The presentation was quite good and all the members know everything about it and all of them seemed to be comfortable in the group, so that part of the job was well done. 

About the activity it was well explained and I really like the topic of acrosport just because I used to practice at school, something to improve maybe will be to put the instructions somewhere but above this I really enjoy the presentation, great job!
Share:

3/04/2017

Act. 1 - Reflections about other groups (Isa)

TRAVELCHERS REVIEW

First of all, I would like to stand the presentation out. Travelchers´ presentation has been the first of this topic (Cooperative Learning) and also of this new subject of the second four-month period at University. Like everybody, all of us have some mistakes and if we have them, we will be able to improve what we have done.

After watching the explanation I can say that every people of the group have enough knowledge of the topic that it was required for being able to explain any point of the topic, anybody and in any moment when the teacher said it. 

They knew from the beginning until the end to hook everybody to their explanation with a short video of the “Lion King” musical. The use of this video, at least in my case, did that I put more attention and interest in what they were explaining about the topic.

I would change a little the organization of the activity. It was confused and not everybody understood the rules. First we had to observe the photo of the figure and then try to construct it. Some of us were doing the figure while they were watching the image. And obviously not everybody could construct the figure. I wasn´t able to put the pieces in the correct place and anybody of the group came and helped me. 


I think it would be a good idea if some person of the group, when the time was off, do the figure at the same time with de rest of the class.




EDUCATIONAL LEAGUE REVIEW


The presentation of this group has been very creative, innovative and catchy. This last point is the most important point because with the costumes they have attracted all my attention. Another thing I have to mention is the staging, that was well prepared and with all the images that they have used it is a very good mix in order to make dynamic and interesting the presentation of the topic.

If I talk about the content of the presentation, I will say that they all knew everything about the topic and they could answer all the confusions and question we had. However, even though all the members of the group had spoken, one of them seems like that person was the leader. One point to keep working on is to have the same weight each member of the group. 

Very Good Job! :)




OTHERSIDERS REVIEW



In my opinion this group has done a very good job. Each member had their own responsibilities but they hadn´t the same weigh. For that reason they had to help other members to make up for doing the same effort everyone. Talking about the responsibilities and objetives I have to mention that Nacho was able to achieve his own objetive. I found him not too comfortable talking in front of the class but he hadn´t any problem with the topic and he could explain it very good.
In the presentation they have used a video in order to show us with images what is the Cooperative Learning. After watching it, and having a preview idea of the topic, I can say that I could associate what I have in my mind with the video and it was clearer than before the presentation of the group. 

One thing I have found so interesting was the fact that they focus the Cooperative Learning like if it is a continual assessment. They said that the things what they have to improve will be the next objetives in next projects. 

The explanation was very deep so I think they should keeping doing it like this time but improving and taking off the repetitions. They have repeated some things in the explanation but a good point is that they have added new things that any group have included. 





FERNWEH REVIEW


I want to start the review mentioning that the activity with the blanket was so great to visualise what is the Cooperative Learning. With this idea we can get the meaning easier and in a funny and entertaining way.  This was a perfect way of starting the presentation because you have a clear meaning of Cooperative Learning and while they keep on explain the topic you are completing the whole meaning of it.

The presentation was dynamic and concrete. They used slides with enough information to understand everything but sometimes I found too much sentences. They have a point because they have innovated adding at the presentation a logo of the team. 

I suggest they need to meet outside the class to be more confident with the topic and also between each other. I know it is very difficult but if they don´t spend enough time to practice, other groups will realize in the presentation of that lack.
Share:

3/02/2017

Act. 2 - Comparing conceptual maps (Blanca)

Last tuesday, each group, had to bring to class a conceptual map about the topic "Inclusive education".
We did a digital conceptual map explaining the different aspects and ideas about it.
 Later on, the teacher asked as to compare our conceptual map with the others memebers of other´s teams so we could talk about the differences between them.
Although I had to go a bit earlier than the class finished, and so, I couldn´t compare them with my classmates, I have ask them to tell me what did they talk about and they have sent me pictures of the other conceptual map we had to work on which was the Education League group so I could also compare it.

Their map Is very visual, colorful and artistic because it has lots of drawings. Ideas are well explained and it is well organizated so it is easy to read. In my opinion, their motto is very well chosen "School doesn´t differ from life" because it totally define the topic.
They have four main sections or roles: Students, teachers, parents and school, and the inforamation selected is very clear.

Comparing it with our map, I would say that the main difference is tha ours is digital and the Educational leagua´s one is hand written. But both of us explained similar ideas in different concepts. But as the biggest similarity I would say that both are clear and understandable.

Share: